One of the Ugliest Films I’ve Ever Seen — “Kingsman: The Secret Service”

by Gabriel Valdez

Look, the review section is going to address the middling craft and storytelling behind this film. Then the Bechdel section is going to rip the utter bejesus out of everything that’s left. Just be warned:

Kingsman: The Secret Service is a movie that has no idea what it wants to be. It follows Eggsy (Taron Egerton), a young Englander who grows up without a father. His dad sacrificed himself for his team on the kind of mission that James Bond makes his bread and butter, and Eggsy wears a medal around his neck he can never show to anyone else. Eggsy’s life consists of getting into trouble and watching out for his mom, who doesn’t have the best choice in boyfriends.

Eggsy is whisked off to a spy school in much the same way Harry Potter is taken to Hogwarts. The first half of Kingsman is as solid as you could ask for, alternating between Eggsy’s training and a mission to save the world being carried out by his sponsor Harry (Colin Firth).

Inevitably, Eggsy is drawn into the mission itself, which pits his team against a villain named Valentine who’s so upset global warming will destroy humankind that he decides to, um, destroy humankind. Just take that kind of logic on faith – the villain’s played by Samuel L. Jackson, who seems to be the only one aware of what a cheeseball movie he’s actually in.

These sorts of plots are also where the film starts to come apart. When a writer (Jane Goldman) and director (Matthew Vaughn) are so obsessed with pushing a political agenda that it shoves everything else in the movie to the side, it becomes uncomfortable.

Any kind of message – liberal or conservative – that guts a film so completely of its story is a problem. The message in Kingsman is conservative. The last movie that did this so egregiously was the liberal-minded remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still. I don’t care what your politics are – if they’re such a priority that a popcorn movie feels more like chastisement than entertainment, the movie’s failed. A movie can have politics in it, yes, but it still has to prioritize being a movie and telling a story.

It’s a shame – Kingsman boasts a well crafted first half and offers some exceptionally choreographed, albeit horrendously violent, action. It just finds as many ways to shoot itself in the foot by the end as I’ve ever witnessed. It has too many politics and grudges to ring out, too many names to drop and meta commentaries to make. If you can’t tell Kingsman is a riff on the spy genre an hour in, don’t worry – characters will stop everything to remind you many, many times.

That’s not even bringing up the McDonald’s product placement, which tries to involve the ad as a meta joke the same way Wayne’s World and Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby have in the past. As it does with many elements, Kingsman feels too unsure of itself to fully commit to the joke – instead of characters nodding and winking at the camera, you end up with Colin Firth and Samuel L. Jackson awkwardly grinding their way through a minute-long in-film ad.

That’s too often the feeling in Kingsman. It criticizes spy movies for being too political, then it obsesses over being political. It insists action movies are too serious and have forgotten how to be light-hearted, and minutes later it’s engaging in an extended sequence where civilians tear each other apart in bloody chunks. If anywhere, this is where the film should nod and wink, a la Shaun of the Dead, but this is where Kingsman doubles down and wants to show you how good it can really be at all the things it just insisted shouldn’t matter.

I love bloody action and rude humor in my films, and even I felt like I had to take a shower after Kingsman. It’s not any worse than a brutal horror movie or the average episode of South Park, but it spends two hours selling you on the idea that these things shouldn’t be part of action movies before turning around and relenting to each of them anyway. It leaves you feeling confused, disappointed, and a little betrayed. Maybe it’s just trying to troll its entire audience. If so, mission accomplished.

In many ways, Kingsman ends up being the polar opposite of last week’s action movie, Jupiter Ascending. Kingsman is a movie that’s not enough of anything to feel very satisfying. Jupiter Ascending is a movie that’s too much of everything. Given the choice, I’d rather be overwhelmed than underwhelmed. If you only have time for one action movie, stick with Jupiter Ascending.

Does it Pass the Bechdel Test?

This section helps us discuss one aspect of movies that we’d like to see improved – the representation of women. Read why we’re including this section here.

1. Does Kingsman: The Secret Service have more than one woman in it?

Yes. Samantha Womack plays Eggsy’s mother. Sofia Boutella plays a baddie named Gazelle. Sophie Cookson plays spy school companion Roxy. Fiona Hampton plays spy school companion Amelia. Hanna Alstrom plays an imprisoned princess.

2. Do they talk to each other?

No. For one very brief moment, both Roxy and Amelia talk to Eggsy, about Eggsy.

3. About something other than a man?

Well, they didn’t pass #2 so this is moot, but women do occasionally talk to men about the sinister plot at the film’s center, when they’re not talking about Eggsy or Valentine.

Look, this movie is, for lack of a better way of putting it, patriarchal as fuck. Eggsy’s mother exists so that he can save her. Gazelle (an amputee who fights with sword-like blade legs) exists so we can fetishize her. It’s also strongly hinted that she’s the sexual reward of the villain, being played by an actor more than twice her age.

Even when the film gives a woman a victory, as happens late in the spy school sequence, the victory is because she’s proven herself to be heartless and have no loyalty. In other words, the single victory given to a woman in the film is due to her not being as good as Eggsy. In storytelling terms, it’s really Eggsy’s victory we admire.

The single reward given to a woman in the movie is to cheer on the men at the end.

And the movie ends with a male hero being rewarded with anal sex from a princess he rescues.

This is all before considering that every hero is a white male and the two villains are an African-American man with a lisp (Samuel L. Jackson) and a differently abled Arab woman (Sofia Boutella).

It’s also worth noting, as Vanessa Tottle has pointed out, that all the soldiers who face our hero are male. This isn’t to save violence against women either – there are sequences where civilians brutally murder each other and women are murdered in the dozens here. If you’re going to do that, then include some female soldiers, too. Otherwise, you’re not being bold, you’re just being exploitative.

The film makes noises toward being anti-aristocratic, but it’s a bit of a false flag – in the end, the movie trumpets all the values of aristocracy and being member to the ruling class.

As damaging as anything else – and this is leaving the Bechdel realm for the moment – we live in a world where dangerous elements in the U.S. believe that President Barack Obama is a villain who is working to destroy our country at the behest of real-world villains. These real-world villains always belong to non-white ethnicities. The dangerous radicals in the U.S. who believe these things talk openly about assassination.

Very minor spoiler ahead: in Kingsman, the villain Valentine has the ear of Obama and convinces him to help destroy the human race. Two African-American men form a conspiracy to destroy the world. In the end, Obama is killed because of this conspiracy. His head is exploded, albeit in pretty colors, and I can’t help but think back to the last president who died that way. Kingsman wants to play this act off as some kind of joke, but coupled with everything else the movie says and does, it’s dangerous and mind-numbingly irresponsible filmmaking.

Jane Goldman and Matthew Vaughn have every right to place this kind of thing in their movie. Britain and the U.S. are free countries, after all. But, as the line goes, freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism, and the movie they’ve constructed not only fails to work as a movie, it encourages some of the worst and most dangerous misogynistic and political perspectives I’ve ever seen put to film.

I try to find the good and the worthy in everything I see. Even if I don’t like a movie, I endeavor to communicate who will like the movie. Sometimes I come across something that – I understand exactly who will like the movie, and that worries me. It worries me that a movie can encourage perspectives of hatred and ownership by making those perspectives seem heroic. It takes characters who seem weak, attributes them with all the worst better-than-thou attitudes our society has to offer, and rewards them for embracing and exemplifying these attitudes. Kingsman is one of the ugliest, most uncomfortable movies I have seen in my life. It is bitterly disappointing.

14 thoughts on “One of the Ugliest Films I’ve Ever Seen — “Kingsman: The Secret Service””

  1. Thank you, God, for sending the beacon of hope that is this review. Having talked to countless people, and having watched with horror as the imdb rating held at a steady 8.2 (The same rating, incidentally, as “Into the Wild” and “The Big Lebowski”), I struggled with the idea that my girlfriend and I were the only humans on planet earth that didn’t get this film. Thank you, Gabriel, for putting my mind at ease. Seems we’re the only ones.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Absolutely. I’ve rarely felt this uncomfortable watching a movie and especially after the solid start, it did feel like a betrayal by the filmmakers, like I’d been suckered into an experience I wanted no part of. I do think it’ll fall off over the years, as audiences outside its intended demographic get a look at it and change the narrative surrounding the film. Or, at least, I hope that’s the case. Take a look through my other reviews – I try to balance a movie’s quality against it’s social commentary as often as I can. I think that’s a way of enjoying movies that’s gaining a foothold.


      1. I loved this movie it was a new age James Bond ( but better) Loved the whole movie and all Characters …………. Kit Flanagan great work


  2. Amen. I watched this movie last night, and am still processing its nasty and calculated provocations. Your review has certainly helped, thank you. I’m saddened that we seem to be the minority.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. “The message in Kingsmen is conservative” …um, what? A movie about global warming that depicts a Christian church in Kentucky as being filled with angry and violent racists, antisemitists, and homophobes (who all end up being brutally murdered) is conservative? Is this oppisite day? I’m guessing my comment will be “filtered” since I’m not a sheep mindlessly cosigning this article’s agenda-driven stupidity. But I guess I’ll take the chance and try. This kind of utter stupidity shouldn’t go unchecked. This movie had an OBVIOUS liberal undertone to it. The Kentucky church scene just put it over the top. What a ridiculous movie…and ridiculous article.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Nope, I don’t filter people who disagree with me. Read around on the site and you’ll find that we do our best to embrace a variety of perspectives when it comes to film.

      There’s a difference in conservatism in Britain from conservatism in the U.S. Most British political parties are dismissive of religion’s role in government, and LGBTQ issues are not the third rail there that they are here. The reason I say Kingsman is conservative is because it specifically reinforces patriarchal gender stereotypes, name drops Reagan and Thatcher as if they’re holy, poses Black leaders as part of a cabal, poses governments – and specifically minority-led governments – as seeking to conspire against the people they represent, poses climate change as an unhealthy obsession that fronts darker conspiratorial designs, poses white men in suits as the only thing that can protect us from Black and Middle Eastern villains, and rather specifically explodes the first Black American president’s head in a manner that echoes the shootings of Abraham Lincoln (who emancipated American slaves) and John F. Kennedy (who was sympathetic to Black civil rights and ending segregation).


    1. My problem isn’t with the movie being un-PC. I like a lot of very un-PC movies. Shop around my reviews a bit if you’d like a better idea of that.

      My problem is that Kingsman strives so hard to be un-PC and present little political asides that these things get in the way of the movie’s plot and fun. I found myself constantly distracted by the inserts and interruptions the movie made. I wanted them to get on with the mayhem and bloodshed the film was much more effective at realizing.

      It wants to lecture viewers on the right way to make a film like this – without politics – and then it sticks in as many politics as it possibly can later on. That hypocrisy doesn’t sit right and it makes for an incredibly inconsistent theme. This also puts stress on certain aspects – the film’s treatment of people of color and women – that may not otherwise be called out in the same way. If the film had managed to stick to its plot and tone, it would have been much better. I genuinely liked it until it was about halfway through and it started interrupting itself every few minutes with a dead-end lecture or political aside. I went to see stylish gunfights and people get punched in the face. I didn’t go to see a smug CliffsNotes on British conservatism, and I felt that’s what it increasingly became.


  4. This review sums up perfectly how I viewed this movie. It’s like they were so pleased with themselves to have a woman in the spy school they forgot to give her any lines. And the ending with the Princess rewarding Eggsy with anal sex was mucky and distasteful. The movie closed on a shot of her bare arse while another dude watched on! For fucks sake – they ruined a good premise by turning it into misogynistic piffle. But your review is 👌


  5. I re rerented this movie when i tented the new one. As a refresher. I got PISSED at the mcdonalds ad part cus the “villan” is suposed to be globally minded… they… mc dees… is one of the worat contributors to that. Was this a political joke. I wanted answers. Seem no one addresses that part. Anyway. I really appreciated this review. It DID explain why i didnt really like it the first tome around… even if i was too stupid to see why… thanks!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s